Epsilon Archive for Student Projects

Abstract

Human-Primate Conflict (HPC) has become an increasing challenge in Sri Lanka. This study provides deeper understanding of how government stakeholders interact in managing this issue. The study examine the perceptions and roles of key government stakeholders involved in HPC managing efforts, and aiming to discover both institutional enablers and challenges. By conducting semi-structured interviews with eight participants from five different government agencies, the research applies Daniels and Walker’s Progress Triangle framework to analyze stakeholder dynamics across three dimensions: Substance, Process, and Relationship. The study highlights how factors such as fragmented institutional responsibilities, communication breakdowns, and lack of trust impact the effectiveness of HPC management.

The findings highlight the varied stakeholder perspectives and varying levels of engagement and commitment in the HPC management process. Additionally, the result revealed the need of constructive, trust-based, and legitimate collaboration, where the management process is perceived as fair, and transparent by all parties involved. In conclusion, the study addresses for an integrated management system that not only balances conservation goals with community needs but also strategically builds trust, understanding, and shared objectives to improve long-term human-primate coexistence. Considering the study context, recommendations include establishing a coordinated institutional framework that enhances transparency and inclusivity.